2022: Iodine Status, Fluoride Exposure, and Thyroid Function in Pregnant Women in the United States

All adverse health effects of fluoride are related to thyroid hormone metabolism.
Post Reply
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5485
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:25 pm

2022: Iodine Status, Fluoride Exposure, and Thyroid Function in Pregnant Women in the United States

Post by admin »

Griebel-Thompson A, Sands S, Chollet-Hinton L, Christifano D, Sullivan D, Hull H, Carlson S - "Iodine Status, Fluoride Exposure, and Thyroid Function in Pregnant Women in the United States" Current Developments in Nutrition 6(1):652 (2022) ABSTRACT ONLY
https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac061.036

Abstract

Objectives

Iodine (I) is an essential nutrient for fetal neurodevelopment through its role in thyroid function. Like I, fluoride (F) is a halogen and urinary F concentration (UFC) has been linked to increased thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) in non-pregnant adults with I deficiency. We hypothesize that F and I may interact in their role on thyroid function among pregnant women.

Methods

Pregnant women (n = 966) provided urine between 12- and 20-weeks gestation. UIC was measured by the modified Sandell-Kolthoff reaction and UFC by a F-sensitive electrode. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure plasma TSH. Associations between 1) UIC and TSH, 2) UFC and TSH, and 3) I status, UFC, and TSH were estimated using generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link. Potential interactions between I status and UFC in association with TSH was also investigated.

Results

The cohort UIC (median: 154.2 µg/L, IQR: 92.9,271.7) indicated a population with marginally adequate I status by WHO criteria. Nearly half (n = 464, 48%) were I insufficient (UIC ≤ 150 µg/L). Median UFC (0.832 mg/L, IQR: 0.495, 1.29) was above the benchmark used to determine risk for child cognition (0.2 mg/L) (Grandjean et al., Risk Anal 2021; doi: 10.1111/risa.13767). Higher UIC was associated with increased TSH (β = 0.0003, SE = 0.0001, p = 0.01). UFC was not related to TSH (p = 0.13); however, a significant interaction between UIC and UFC was observed (p = 0.01). When analyzing only I insufficient participants, UFC and TSH were inversely associated (β = 0.1488, p = 0.0004). No association between UFC and TSH was observed for I adequate participants (p = 0.63).

Conclusions

Changes in TSH in relation to UIC and UFC were counter to our hypothesis as the relationship between UFC and TSH was inverse and only in I insufficient participants. Future research should explore if TSH is the best indicator of thyroid function in pregnancy and the mechanisms underlying the effects of pre-and postnatal F exposure on child cognition.

PFPC Comment: Unfortunately, the authors do not mention here that all women in this study were part of the ADORE cohort. [ADORE - Assessment of Docosahexaenoic Acid on Reducing Early Preterm Birth]. All women in this study were also given DHA (200 mg standard care). [DHA influences thyroid hormone metabolism]. Others received either an additional 1000 mg, or a placebo containing soybean oil - which is also well-established to affect TH metabolism.
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5485
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:25 pm

Dietary and Supplemental Iodine Intake and Urinary Iodine Concentration in a Large Pregnancy Cohort in the United States

Post by admin »

SEE also:

Griebel-Thompson A, Sands S, Chollet-Hinton L, Christifano D, Sullivan D, Hull H, Carlson S - "Dietary and Supplemental Iodine Intake and Urinary Iodine Concentration in a Large Pregnancy Cohort in the United States" Current Developments in Nutrition 6(1):651 (2022) ABSTRACT ONLY
https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac061.035
  • UPDATE: Study published in 2023:

    Griebel-Thompson AK, Sands S, Chollet-Hinton L, Christifano D, Sullivan DK, Hull H, Camargo JT, Carlson SE - "Iodine Intake From Diet and Supplements and Urinary Iodine Concentration in a Cohort of Pregnant Women in the United States" Am J Clin Nutr 118(1):283-289 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.04.005
EAR = Estimated Average Requirement
RDA = Recommended Daily Allowance

Abstract

Objectives

The EAR and RDA for iodine (I) intake in pregnancy are 160 and 220 µg/d, respectively; however, dietary I intake by United States (US) pregnant women is unknown. Several professional organizations have recommended a supplement of 150 µg/d during pregnancy, though, the current use of prenatal supplements with I is also unknown. Our objective was to determine I intake from diet and supplements and relate I intake to I status, measured by urinary I concentration (UIC).

Methods

Pregnant women (n = 966) were interviewed about their dietary intake by the Diet History Questionnaire 2.0 or multiple 24-hour recalls at baseline and their dietary I intake was estimated using the USDA, FDA and ODS-NIH Database for the Iodine Content of Common Foods (ICCF). Participants were interviewed monthly until delivery to assess I intake from prenatal supplements. Urine samples were collected between 12–20 weeks of gestation, and UIC was measured by the modified Sandell-Kolthoff reaction. A chi-square test compared groups with insufficient and adequate I status to the proportion who met the EAR for I intake.

Results

The group median intake of I from diet was below the EAR (108.8 µg/d) however, median intake increased to 188.5 µg/day when supplemental I was included. Seventy-three % of participants (707/966) had a dietary intake below the EAR and 45% (436/966) remained below the EAR after including supplemental I. The group median UIC of 154.2 µg/L indicated a population with marginally adequate I status by WHO standards. Almost half (48%) had a UIC considered to be I insufficient (≤150 µg/L) by WHO. Although slightly more than half (55%, 529/966) were taking a supplement containing I, only 27% (259/966) were taking the recommended 150 µg/d. Iodine status was significantly associated with EAR intake, with 52.1% (227/436) of those with an intake below the EAR being I insufficient (UIC ≤ 150 µg/L) compared to 44.7% (237/530) of those with an I intake above the EAR (p = 0.0229).

Conclusions

While consuming a prenatal supplement with I improved the proportion of participants with an intake above the EAR, nearly 45% of the group who consumed more than the EAR had insufficient I status.
Post Reply