DuPont Contaminated James River

There are more than 7 million PFAS and over 21 million fluorinated compounds listed in PubChem (2023).
Post Reply
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5485
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:25 pm

DuPont Contaminated James River

Post by admin »

First Posted: 02 Mar 2006 10:46 am

News From USW: DuPont Contaminated James River with ''Likely''
Carcinogen; PFOA Public Officials and Employees Kept in the Dark

RICHMOND, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 1, 2006

According to findings by the United Steelworkers International Union (USW), the controversial Teflon-related chemical, PFOA, was released to the James River from DuPont's Spruance plant in Richmond, Virginia.

The Richmond plant is one of the about thirteen known DuPont
locations nation-wide where PFOA or PFOA-related chemicals have been
used. Contamination of groundwater, nearby rivers, and drinking
water is known to have occurred at several of these locations.
However, many of these plants, like the Richmond facility, still
have not been investigated by state or federal regulatory agencies.

The USW began researching PFOA contamination after learning that its
own members were being exposed at DuPont and possibly at
manufacturing plants around the country. USW research from DuPont
plants in Ohio and North Carolina has been shared with regulatory
agencies, and environmental and labor organizations.

According to a 1991 "confidential" company document, DuPont's
concerns over the levels of PFOA, also called C8, contamination in
discharges into the James River were such that the plant considered
cutting back production during low river flows. DuPont stated to The
Richmond Times Dispatch (Virginia) in 2004 that it stopped using
PFOA at its Richmond plant in the late 1990's and phased out
production of Teflon fibers after selling its business unit in 2002.
However, the USW suspects that the coating of some Kevlar products,
which in the past involved the use of PFOA, has continued.

DuPont's internal documents from the 1970's and 80's also express
concern over the potential exposure of employees. After learning in
1981 that PFOA could cause birth defects in laboratory rats, DuPont
transferred female employees of "childbearing potential" at plants
in Ohio and West Virginia out of areas where they might be exposed
to PFOA.

Thirty-one female employees at the Richmond plant were known to work
in such areas, but were not transferred. That decision, according to
a DuPont document, was based on the results of only six blood
samples that did not show blood levels of PFOA above what DuPont
considered to be an acceptable level.

The Ampthill Rayon Workers, Inc. (ARWI) represents about 1,100
employees at the Richmond plant and asked DuPont for information
about workplace exposures of PFOA in 2004. According to ARWI
President Jay Palmore, "documents shared by the USW make it clear
that the company did not provide all the information we asked for.
DuPont did not provide documents showing that PFOA may have been
escaping from the Teflon and Kevlar products we handled."

The ARWI is concerned that workers may have been contaminated with
the toxic chemical that scientists say can take 20 years to be
eliminated from the body. Another request has been made for
information about employee blood sampling and incidences of birth
defects.

The US Environmental Protection Agency's Science Advisory Board has
identified PFOA, which is used to make Teflon, a "likely" human
carcinogen. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality only
learned about the use of PFOA at Spruance in 2004, following The
Richmond Times Dispatch news article. That was also the first time
the agency learned about water contamination from 1991 or earlier.

According to the USW, environmental agencies need to determine if
PFOA is still present in wastewater discharges or has contaminated
groundwater beneath the plant. The USW represents 1800 workers at
DuPont and 850,000 in the U.S. and Canada, and is the largest
industrial union in North America.
Post Reply